- RISE OF THE TOMB RAIDER PC REVIEW IGN 1080P
- RISE OF THE TOMB RAIDER PC REVIEW IGN FULL
- RISE OF THE TOMB RAIDER PC REVIEW IGN PC
I think it really comes down to the games locations as like i said earlier, the snowy sections don't look that good but other areas of Rise look way better than U4 IMO.
RISE OF THE TOMB RAIDER PC REVIEW IGN 1080P
I think its a bit unfair to say you can't compair Rise at 4k to U4 at 1080p but what ever. I bought U4 for 30$ and Rise also for 30$. I can't explain why U4 is better in terms of Framerate, Resolution or Graphic Technology,īut just that it's more compelling to me than Rise. Rise is the sum of technically superior parts. U4 is way more than the sum of its parts. Great Art is more than the sum of its parts. you can't David Gilmour songs don't measure up technically as the fastest guitar solos ever.īut it doesn't matter. Uncharted 4's choice of locations and set them up is something that can't be measured with metrics the same way. the same way Yngwei can play the fastest guitar solo ever with amazing riffs, arpeggies and all kinds of advanced techniquesīut. I don't doubt that Rise uses much better technology for its graphics - Better Anti-Aliasing, Shadows, Texture filtering and what not. Overall, shadow and texture quality is better in Rise (well, at least it looks more realistic to me) so I would say that RotTR, in my opinion, has the upper hand. Prophet's tomb/Siberian wilderness/Acropolis are beyond stunning. Naughty Dog did a really great job with that game and you can tell they did put a lot of (long) work on it.īut I have to say that on pc, if you can't push RotTR to its max settings, you won't be able to tell how good this game looks. I've played Uncharted 4, and, in my opinion, it's the best looking game on consoles. Originally posted by 93Florent:I honestly think that both did an excellent job pushing hardware to limit. Then I was pretty surprised that didn't happen.Īlso, U4 and Rise are pretty linear games so can't agree that makes a difference. I spent 30$ on Rise expecting that my GTX 1070 will blow U4 visuals out of the water. the Snow section of Tomb Raider looks pretty bad in comparison.
RISE OF THE TOMB RAIDER PC REVIEW IGN PC
I love pc gaming high frame rates and great visuals and all,īut i've never really noticed Low res textures at the corner of the screen in U4.Īs a whole package U4 visuals looked amazing.Īnd yes. You could get a Titan XP and a 4K IPS 144hz monitor and say it looks better than U4.
It looks like you have played both U4 and Rise or atleast acknowledge the existence of U4. If you look at these two screenshots, U4 clearly has some issues with low res textures around the edge of the screen in the distance which TR (when on AFx16) never seems to have.įirstly, just like to say that I appreciate a comment from someone who knows what he's talking about! Also the textures in TR are more consistant IMO as U4 has nice textures but the anisotropic filtering is awful. Also uncharted is much more linear than TR so the console can manage to put out such good visuals and the fact that its an exclusive means the devs only have to optimise it for 1 platform.
I think the snowy areas of Rise maybe don't look as good as i personally don't really like the snow, but in syria and geothermal valley rise definatly looks better, especially at 4k ultra.
RISE OF THE TOMB RAIDER PC REVIEW IGN FULL
Full 4k, higher res textures (requieres 6gb vram), better res shadows, better lighting, better AO (VXAO), better hair effects, better reflections etc. Originally posted by JonathanWhiting13:Rise looks better mate. But either way both games look good, I just get the feeling that U4 isn't as good looking as people seem to think it is and that overall Rise has a more consistant look with very few compromises (not to say that there are non) and the overall look is better than U4 IMO. Maybe im just being a PC elitist, but after playing alot of games on PC and console you start to realise that consoles cut alot of corners to look as good as they do which the PC dosn't have to do and as a result you end up with problems like blury textures and shadows in the background. If you look at these two screenshots, U4 clearly has some issues with low res textures around the edge of the screen in the distance which TR (when on AFx16) never seems to have.
0 kommentar(er)
